Participatory Gains and Policy Effectiveness: The Open Method of Co‐ordination Information Society
Identifieur interne : 000481 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000480; suivant : 000482Participatory Gains and Policy Effectiveness: The Open Method of Co‐ordination Information Society
Auteurs : Alison Harcourt [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies [ 0021-9886 ] ; 2013-07.
Abstract
This article provides empirical findings on the relationship between the open method of co‐ordination and participation (OMC). Empirically, it draws on within‐case analysis to examine how participation, venues and outcomes have varied in different domains of information society policy. This is a challenging case for claims about the participatory effects of the OMC because it is not a policy originally designed to address social policy concerns or unemployment problems. The main conceptual argument is that the OMC is a political opportunity structure that distributes participatory gains. The article examines this opportunity structure by separating out the dimensions of ‘procedure’ and ‘outcomes’ and including ‘transparency’ as a moderating variable. The findings point to participatory effects in all but one case, although not for the same actors and at the same level (European Union or national/sub‐national).
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12022
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000C72
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000C70
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000138
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000482
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000481
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Participatory Gains and Policy Effectiveness: The Open Method of Co‐ordination Information Society</title><author><name sortKey="Harcourt, Alison" sort="Harcourt, Alison" uniqKey="Harcourt A" first="Alison" last="Harcourt">Alison Harcourt</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:C23B356EE91E0D4CCBBDE0D1A7D23561DAC89ADF</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/jcms.12022</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/C23B356EE91E0D4CCBBDE0D1A7D23561DAC89ADF/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000C72</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000C70</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000138</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0021-9886:2013:Harcourt A:participatory:gains:and</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000482</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000481</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000481</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Participatory Gains and Policy Effectiveness: The Open Method of Co‐ordination Information Society</title><author><name sortKey="Harcourt, Alison" sort="Harcourt, Alison" uniqKey="Harcourt A" first="Alison" last="Harcourt">Alison Harcourt</name><affiliation></affiliation><affiliation></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Royaume-Uni</country></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">J Common Mark Stud</title><idno type="ISSN">0021-9886</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-5965</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="2013-07">2013-07</date><biblScope unit="volume">51</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="667">667</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="683">683</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0021-9886</idno></series><idno type="istex">C23B356EE91E0D4CCBBDE0D1A7D23561DAC89ADF</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/jcms.12022</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JCMS12022</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0021-9886</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">This article provides empirical findings on the relationship between the open method of co‐ordination and participation (OMC). Empirically, it draws on within‐case analysis to examine how participation, venues and outcomes have varied in different domains of information society policy. This is a challenging case for claims about the participatory effects of the OMC because it is not a policy originally designed to address social policy concerns or unemployment problems. The main conceptual argument is that the OMC is a political opportunity structure that distributes participatory gains. The article examines this opportunity structure by separating out the dimensions of ‘procedure’ and ‘outcomes’ and including ‘transparency’ as a moderating variable. The findings point to participatory effects in all but one case, although not for the same actors and at the same level (European Union or national/sub‐national).</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Royaume-Uni</li></country></list><tree><country name="Royaume-Uni"><noRegion><name sortKey="Harcourt, Alison" sort="Harcourt, Alison" uniqKey="Harcourt A" first="Alison" last="Harcourt">Alison Harcourt</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Belgique/explor/OpenAccessBelV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000481 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000481 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Belgique
|area= OpenAccessBelV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:C23B356EE91E0D4CCBBDE0D1A7D23561DAC89ADF
|texte= Participatory Gains and Policy Effectiveness: The Open Method of Co‐ordination Information Society
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |